SOG Flash II - Knife Review

The SOG Flash II was the first knife I started carrying daily.  I've had this model (a slightly older version than the one currently offered by SOG) for nearly 8 years.  It's seen a decent amount of use and has been plenty loved.

I own the aluminum handled version with a partially serrated blade.  The following review is considering it as close to new as possible; any wear that has occurred with age will not adversely affect the score.  While SOG has slightly adjusted their locking mechanism the knife hasn't changed much since this particular model was purchased; as such, I imagine this discussion is still relevant for current iterations.  Also, it appears that SOG is no longer producing an aluminum handled model; this isn't necessarily a bad thing as the glass-reinforced nylon handles drop the price to a more reasonable level.  This is the closest model SOG currently offers.

There are plenty of variations of the Flash II.  Too many to list.  Their MSRP is around $80.00 and they can be found online in the ballpark of $45.00.

Blade Material:  1/2

For some reason SOG loves its AUS-8 steel.  I would prefer that they didn't.  AUS-8 is a mid-range steel that, in my experience, requires far too much effort to keep sharp.  After opening a stack of packages it's back to the sharpener or you're struggling with a dull blade.  I've found myself sharpening it at least twice a week just to keep a decent edge.  SOG does a decent heat-treatment on it, but it's still a bit of a disappointment.  Sure, it's relatively easy to replace the edge, but it's not worth the tradeoff, in my opinion.  In the grand scheme of things, it's not a terrible steel, but it's not high-end by any stretch.

Fit of Parts:  1/2

Lateral blade play, even when closed.  It's something that I'm so frustrated with on the Flash II that I'm willing to dock it points in both this category and on its locking mechanism.  When closed, the blade can travel the width of the inner handle area.  It is, by far, one of the most irritating things that I've endured on a knife.

Blade Shape:  2/2

The Flash II sports a basic drop point blade.  It's a great everyday carry shape and is well-suited to most cutting tasks.

Blade Grind:  2/2

The full flat grind on the Flash II is executed well.  It's a robust grind that stands up to (relative) punishment well.

Mechanism:  0/2

The lock-up on this knife is sloppy.  There is plenty of lateral play in the blade.  It wiggles visibly in a manner that doesn't engender confidence whatsoever.  I can't remember if it was sloppy from day one, or if it has loosened with use, but even if the latter is the case there is no reason that it should have.  I even had the pivot bearing and locking mechanism tightened under warranty and it didn't really change much.

Sure, I haven't experienced catastrophic failure of the locking mechanism, it hasn't closed on my hand or something awful, but a decent mechanism shouldn't allow that much (or any) lateral movement in an open (or closed) blade.

Perhaps this is a problem that has been alleviated with the newer (looking) locking mechanism, but from what I've read, it's  problem with all the Flash series.

Design Concept:  1/2

I was initially drawn to the Flash II because it's a neat looking knife.  That said, after carrying it for a long while, there are a few things that bother me.  For example, the area of the blade that engages with the lock is exposed when the blade is closed; this annoys me.  The handle could have been designed in such a manner as to avoid exposing this portion of the blade. 

Grip:  1/2

I have the aluminum handled model.  The scales are nicely textured and there is adequate purchase when using the knife.

Deployment Method:  1/2

The assisted opening system on the Flash II isn't terrible.  It can be addictive to play with but I'm not buying SOG's assertion that it has "wicked-quick blade access."  The assisted opening isn't the fastest I've played with (the Kershaw Leek springs open far quicker).  Moreover, the thumb stud isn't the best out there; it seems a bit small due to its tapered design and close proximity to the handle.  A well-designed manual blade can be just as fast if not faster.

They also say that they had the "foresight to incorporate an additional safety lock" such that there would be "added security" when the blade is closed.  I'm a bit confused by this statement.  It's a knife that features an assisted opening mechanism.  As such, it can be assumed that the knife is designed for rapid deployment.  However, the additional safety lock merely adds another step in the opening process.  Sure, you can leave it off when the knife is in your pocket but why even have it there?  It just seems like a superfluous feature.

Carry Method:  2/2

If there's one thing that SOG has done right with some of their folding knives it's their deep carry pocket clips.  I do quite like the rear-mounted clip.  It allows the whole knife to sit in the pocket with only the very top of the pocket clip exposed.  It's more discrete than other clips, which can be an asset in certain pairs of pants.  I don't mind sporting a more visible knife and I doubt others often notice when I do, but it's a great feature.

Moreover, the clip design forces tip-up carry.  While choice is sometimes a good thing, there really isn't much of a reason to offer tip-down carry on most knives.  There are no good reasons to carry tip-down.

My one gripe is the size of the lanyard hole.  It's relatively small.  My go-to lanyard material is gutted paracord and the lanyard hole on the Flash II is too small to accept a piece.  This isn't something that I would consider a glaring flaw, though, just a minor inconvenience.

Carry Comfort:  1/2

This knife is thick. It's thicker than my Para-Military2, my CRKT M16-14SFG, and various other knives in my collection.  That said, it's not uncomfortable to carry.  The knife's profile, coupled with the deep carry pocket clip, makes it sit pretty well in a pocket.

Total:  12/20

Conclusions:

The SOG Flash II could make a good entry-level EDC blade.  It's not too terribly expensive and, overall, is a decent value for your money.

Nitecore EX11.2 Flashlight Review

I've been using my Nitecore EX11.2 for some time now.  I carry it daily and have used it extensively.

It was a light that I fawned over for quite a while, as I do with most of the things I buy.  After finally finding an excuse, I picked one up and it's served tirelessly since it was received.

I'm using the template found here to review the Nitecore EX11.2.

Design Concept:  2

In the spirit of full disclosure, I pined over this flashlight for the longest time.  I love its design.  The stainless steel bezel looks great against the anodizing of the body.  It's clean without any superfluous features.  Just the way gear should be put together.

From a functional design perspective it's well-designed.  There aren't any superfluous features on this light.

Materials:  2

The barrel of the light is predominantly aluminum.  The piston mechanism is machined from aluminum, too.  The bezel of the light is manufactured from stainless steel.

These materials are exceptionally common in the mid-range flashlight world.  They're durable, relatively lightweight, and look good.

I can say that the flashlight, as constructed, survives a decent beating.  After a few unintended trips from my pockets to asphalt it still functions flawlessly and only has slight cosmetic damage character.

Fit of Parts:  2

The EX11.2 is well-fitted.  There is no play between any of the constituent parts.  There isn't anything to complain about in terms of how the light goes together.

Output:  2

200 lumen from a single-cell pocket-sized light is exceptional.  Moreover, the "moonlight" setting of 5 lumen is incredibly useful in low-light situations for reading or other such tasks without obliterating night vision.

The infinitely variable output is interesting, but I can't say that it's the greatest system around.  Sometimes having too many choices is detrimental.

Runtime:  2

The light runs at 200 lumen for an hour and at 5 lumen for approximately 80 hours.  In terms of a single-cell light that's not too shabby. 

The CR123a is a great battery for an EDC light, in my opinion; it's relatively compact and is pretty versatile.  The EX11.2 makes good use of the CR123a, offering average runtime for the output levels available.  Given that the low- to mid-range output levels are adequate for most applications, the battery will last for quite some time.

Beam Pattern and Quality:  2

The Nitecore EX11.2 uses a CREE R5 LED with an orange peel reflector.  It has great throw for a single-cell light with a relatively shallow reflector.  It pushes useful light out to an adequate distance for an EDC light (probably somewhere between 50 and 75 meters; I'll work on a more accurate number in the future).  Flood isn't bad, either.  It's a good light for everyday, general purpose use.

Also, the beam has a nice hotspot that transitions cleanly into the corona.  Moreover, the beam is free from artifacts.

User Interface:  1

The Nitecore EX11.2 has an infinitely variable output that's controlled by the piston mechanism.  A single press turns the light on; then, pressing and holding the piston ramps up or down the brightness.  There are shortcuts to the lowest and highest settings once the light is on.  Additionally, when the light is off there are shortcuts to the SOS beacon and strobe settings.

Infinitely variable brightness is neat but not as useful as it might sound.  If anything it complicates access to mid-range brightnesses.

Inconveniently, the piston mechanism can be a bit touchy.  On many occasions I've accidentally accessed modes that weren't intended.  I think it has something to do with the fact that the piston drive is capable of recognizing "pushes" that occur in very quick succession; pushes that are unintended and practically imperceptible by the operator.  This can lead to some frustration on occasion.

Grip: 2

A lot of single-cell lights don't offer enough surface area to facilitate comfortable use.  The EX11.2, however, is large enough to use in a hammer grip without obscuring the bezel or placing the button too far into the hand to easily access.

It is also quite possible to use the EX11.2 in a cigar hold.  I find myself pinching the light closer to the bezel than I might with two-cell lights.  Nonetheless, it's quite possible to use in such a fashion.

It should also be noted that the EX11.2 can tail stand.  It's a very useful feature allowing it to be used as a candle.

Carry Method:  1

There is an optional pocket clip for the EX11.2.  I chose to purchase it but am not using it for purposes of this review.

I've been carrying the EX11.2 vertically in my back pocket with a short lanyard.  It's easy to retrieve either with or without the lanyard.  Of course, anything loose in a pocket will eventually find its way to the bottom.

Carry Comfort: 1

The EX11.2 is pretty comfortable to carry.  In the configuration mentioned above it's no thicker than my wallet so it's practically imperceptible.  It does use CR123a batteries, so it's a bit more bulky than other single-cell options on the market.  Also, without a clip the flashlight can find its way to uncomfortable positions.

Total:  17/20

In sum, the Nitecore EX11.2 is a great little light.  The UI is a bit clunky, but is overall functional.  It can be carried well and works hard; really that's all you can ask from an EDC light.

LAMY Safari Fountain Pen EF Nib Review

I picked up another LAMY Safari fountain pen this past summer.  I've owned a Safari with a F nib for quite some time and, liking the line but wanting something a bit more precise, thought that picking up an EF nibbed version would be an excellent choice.

Materials:  1

LAMY's Safari line is manufactured from plastic.  It's a particularly robust plastic that doesn't have the "cheapness" feel of other inexpensive pens on the market.  I haven't experienced any cracking or other such damage in the years that I've owned Safaris.  It's nothing too exciting but it's functional as all get out.

Fit:  2

The Safari line is impeccably constructed.  There are no unwanted wiggles, rattles (it's a fountain pen, there usually aren't any rattles as there usually aren't any internal moving parts to rattle about), or other such undesirables.

The barrel screws down onto the grip section smoothly and tightens down to align the nib with the two facets of the barrel.  The "LAMY" logo on the top of the barrel can either find itself facing upward or downward but the shape of the pen remains the same consistently.

Mechanism:  2

The pen utilizes a capped design, as do most fountain pens.  Unlike most, however, the cap snaps on well and posts tight when open.

Line:  2

Initially, I owned a F nib Safari and found that it wasn't nearly as fine as I would have wanted.  The EF nib on this particular model is more to my liking.

I have been using Noodler's "Bad Belted Kingfisher."  It's just the right kind of blue...

The nib lays down an impeccably smooth line of a consistent thickness and color.

Writing Comfort:  1

There's technically a "right way" to hold fountain pens which LAMY has embraced in the design of their Safari series of pens.  Featuring two flattened grip areas ever so slightly flanking the top of the grip, the Safari promotes "proper" technique, allowing one to properly align the pen within one's fingers.

I do like this grip design, but occasionally, when feeling lazy or otherwise attempting to write with a different pen orientation, I find the grip to be unforgiving.  The crisp edges, while comfortable when writing "correctly," can be quite uncomfortable even when ever so slightly misaligned.

Design Concept:  2

The Safari series is a rather well-received line primarily because of LAMY's impeccable attention to its design.  It's easy to say that the LAMY Safari line is iconic in the world of writing instruments.

Its clean and thoughtful lines are exactly what I look for in a pen.

Markings and Insignia:  2

LAMY has their logo molded into the top of the barrel.  It pops just enough to be noticed but not enough to be gaudy.  The nib sports LAMY's logo, too, and also features the size (EF, in this case).  On the very top of the pen LAMY notes their German origins.

It's a very clean pen without any superfluous text or logos.

Carry Method:  2

The Safari uses a large pocket clip that mounts to the pen very high on the cap.  This allows it to sit low in the pocket, a feature that I prefer.

Carry Durability:  1

The clip works well.  However, it does lose tension over time and if consistently clipped to thicker fabrics (jeans, for example) will begin to show signs that the mount is being over-stressed.

I haven't experienced a failure of the pocket clip in any of the Safaris I own, but they do appear to wear faster than other designs on the market (the rOtring 600 series, for example).

Carry Comfort:  1

The body and cap of the pen are relatively wide making the Safari feel rather large when clipped in a front pocket.  It is, however, exceptionally lightweight.  Its volume is really the only thing that makes it noticeable when carried.

Total:  16/20

The LAMY Safari is a great pen for the money.  The EF nib performs as expected and will meet the needs of most writers without fuss.  It's an excellent pen for both those new to fountain pens and long-time veterans.

Triple Aught Design FAST Pack Lightspeed Review

I've had my Triple Aught Design FAST Pack Lightspeed for a little over one year.  I've used it extensively for school, hiking, kayaking, running, and various other tasks that have arose.

Triple Aught Design FAST Pack Lightspeed shown with TAD's OP1 pouch

Picking the Lightspeed

I'm not sure when I formally started looking for a backpack.  It probably began when I started noticing Triple Aught Design's products on the internet and saw their packs in various places.

For some reason I felt compelled to purchase a backpack.  I wanted something bombproof; an over-designed bag that I could take anywhere and beat to hell in confidence.  TAD's FAST Pack Lightspeed was on the top of the list.

I have yet to be disappointed.

Specifics 
(pulled straight from the product page)

Material

• 1000 Denier Invista Cordura® Fabric

Dimensions

• Volume: 1300.00 cu in/21.30 L
• 12" W x 22" H x 5" D

Weight

• 56.00 oz

Pocket Configuration

• Top External Pocket with Zipper and Accessory Slots
• Two Internal Mesh Pockets with Zippers
• Internal Patch Pocket (fits water bladder) with Two TriGlide Rings and Hanging Clip

Zippers & Hardware

• ITW Nexus GhillieTex™ Fasteners
• NM DuraFlex Auto-Lok Buckles
• YKK® #8 and #10 Nylon Coil Reverse Zippers

Features

• Zippered Clamshell Opening
• Hypalon Reinforced Top Handle
• Top Access Water Bladder Port
• Two Drain Hole Bottom Grommets
• Two Compression Shoulder Straps
• Horizontal Sternum Strap
• Removable Waistbelt with Webbing
• Removable Transporter Tail
• Mesh and Foam Lining on Back Panel
• PALS Webbing Rows
• Built to MIL-SPEC Material and Construction Standards

Made in the USA

Formal Review

I'm using the outline found here to review the Lightspeed.

Design Concept:  2

This is a hard-use bag, plain and simple.  It looks like it can take a beating.  The pack is streamlined and slim.

If I could muster a complaint it would be that the bag can seem busy.  It is covered in MOLLE webbing.  As such, the exterior of the pack is a bit cluttered.  It doesn't really detract from the bag's design quality, though.  It does look more "tactical" than it otherwise would but that's more of a personal aesthetic choice than anything.

Materials:  2

1000 denier Cordura is a favorite among high-end military-type bags.  It's very durable, highly water-resistant, and exceptionally abrasion resistant.

When it comes to constructing a bag that can take a beating, 1000 denier Cordura is the way to go.  Sure, it's a bit heavy, but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make for the durability the fabric offers.

Hardware:  2

TAD has sourced some pretty exceptional hardware for the Lightspeed.  The zippers are all YKK and in the year I've been using the bag I haven't encountered any problems.  The zipper pulls are paracord with high-end caps.  All the Lightspeed's fasteners and buckles are high-quality and, as with the zippers, have given me zero trouble.

Construction: 2

Bags are constructed by stitching.  Stitching can make or break a bag.  High quality materials can be impotent if they're not fastened together well.

That said, the stitching on the Lightspeed is exceptional.  Short of one longer-than-it-should-be thread which I quickly trimmed there were not and have not been any problems with the stitching on the bag.

Packing:  1

Backpacks require conscientious packing.  That said, some packs facilitate packing better than others.

The Lightspeed packs relatively easily.  The main zippered compartment has a clamshell opening which allows the bag to open quite wide.  My main complaint is that the clamshell doesn't extend all the way to the bottom of the bag.  This leaves a small section (approximately 3 1/2 - 4 inches tall) that doesn't unzip.  This section is a bit irritating to pack.  It would be far easier to pack the whole of the bag if the zipper extended further toward the bottom of the bag.

Retrieval:  1

Retrieving things from a backpack is directly proportional to how well they're packed.  Of course, there are bags that facilitate retrieval better than others.  The Lightspeed isn't bad in this department.

Being a backpack it's necessary to remove the bag to get anything out of its compartments.  Of course, that hinders retrieval a bit.

The design of the bag also creates difficulty.  The "beaver tail," as useful as it is, attaches to the bag in a way that requires loosening or unbuckling to retrieve anything from the main compartment.

Organization:  2

There isn't much to the pack itself.  There are two compartments, the large main compartment and a small admin-style pocket in the upper front of the bag.  Inside the main compartment there are two additional zipper pockets and a sleeve for a hydration bladder.

The exterior admin pocket contains a number of stitched-in pockets of varying sizes.  I typically carry a small notebook, a pen and pencil, a two-cell flashlight (Fenix TK-12), four spare batteries in a small holster, a Leatherman Charge TTi with additional driver bits, a flash drive, and a stick of Carmex.  It all fits and it's organized well.

The two interior zipper pockets are pretty convenient and I use them frequently.  The upper compartment can occasionally compete for space with the exterior admin pocket as they share space.

The pack's hydration sleeve is a nice feature.  There is a hanger at the top to attach a hydration badder.  A quick tip, when selecting a hydration bladder for the Lightspeed I strongly suggest getting a "slim" version such as Source Hydration's version found here.

As with most packs, there's a small hanger at the top for keys and whatnot.

Additionally, there are two attachment points at the top of the pack, presumably for their discontinued MOLLE panel.  I haven't found any uses for them, but they're there.

Modularity / Expandability:  2

MOLLE.  Everywhere.

There are countless possibilities for expanding the capabilities of this pack.

Personally, I often have TAD's OP1 attached to the pack.

It's worth noting here that the Lightspeed has two ax loops on either side.  They're incredibly convenient for attaching things, axes or otherwise.

Weight: 1

At 56 oz (3.5 lbs) it's not the heaviest bag I've ever carried, but it's not the lightest either.  My first time picking up the bag was surprising; it was a bit heavier than I was expecting.  After throwing it on my back and carrying it around for a while I realized that it's not really that heavy.

The high-density Cordura is primarily responsible for the weight of the bag.  Without it, though, the bag wouldn't be the same.

That said, the bag could probably be a bit lighter.  For example, the GORUCK GR1 has a slightly larger interior volume (26 liters compared to the Lightspeed's 21.3 liters) but is 0.3 lbs lighter.  It's not a very large difference but it's there.

Carry Comfort: 1

The Lightspeed isn't too uncomfortable to carry.  It's average, plain and simple.

My biggest complaint with the comfort of the Lightspeed is the back panel.  The air-mesh on the pack's back panel is annoying.  It doesn't make the panel more breathable and it has the potential to cause irritation on bare skin.  This happens quite often when running with the pack as the bottom of my shirt tends to ride up exposing my bare skin to the mesh.

Carryology doesn't like air mesh, and I completely agree.

Short of the mesh, though, the pack is comfortable.  With a fully-loaded pack (including three liters of water, and a DSLR with accessories) it's unobtrusive, even in long-term carry.  Additionally, the slim design of the pack makes it friendly to more athletic pursuits.


Total:  16/20 

The Lightspeed is an excellent bag.  While it's a bit expensive as far as bags go, it's well worth the price.  I enjoy using it and expect it to faithfully serve me for the foreseeable future. 

 

Spyderco Para-Military2 Knife Review

I've had an opportunity to kick the Spyderco Para-Military2 around the block for a good while and figured it was time to type up the review.

I unboxed it here and, suffice it to say, I've only grown more attached.

The Para-Military2 is a hot topic.  It seems like many people are buzzing about its design and quality.  I will be not be an exception to this trend, it seems.

Of course, I'm using the template found here.

Blade Material:  2

S30V.  A great steel in all respects.  S30V touts great edge retention, toughness, and corrosion resistance.  The steel is hard enough to keep a razor edge through firm use without being so brittle as to chip or splinter when encountering harder materials.

Sharpening was a breeze and I achieved a shaving sharp edge with relative ease (using a Smith's fine diamond stone initially and finishing with a fine Arkansas).  I have found it easier to obtain exceptionally sharp results with S30V than with any of the other steels I've sharpened.  Perhaps this is because S30V can simply take a sharper edge than its softer brethren or perhaps its some fluke in my perception.  Either way, I'm quite content.

Fit of Parts:  2

The Para-Military2 is the first Spyderco knife I own.  It's exceptionally well constructed.  There is nothing to complain about with respect to how this knife fits together.

When I first moved the pocket clip to the position I desired it had some side-to-side wiggle but this was remedied by torquing the screws down a bit more (I have since learned that I don't need to be gentle).  After tightening down the pocket clip I haven't experienced any movement in it whatsoever.

Blade Shape:  2

It's an excellent EDC blade, that's for sure.  The blade has sufficient belly for great slicing and a pronounced point for penetrating material.

Also worth noting is that the blade length is a great size.  It's not too long to be awkward (in terms of either manipulation or social perception) and just long enough to be useful in more than minor instances.  I feel good using this knife for everything from minor tasks (like cutting an errant thread from my shirt) to more major work (say, feathering kindling and splitting firewood, if you're so inclined).

The tip of the blade is relatively thin.  I haven't encountered any problems with it and I don't expect to run into any tasks which will compel me to use the knife as a pry-bar.

The shape, in terms of design, is quite nice.  Most of the Spyderco blades I've seen have sort of an organic feel to them, the Para-Military2 is no exception.

Blade Grind:  2

The Spyderco Para-Military2 features a full flat-ground blade.  The blade starts thick at the spine and tapers at a consistent angle to the edge.  It's a great shape.  I haven't had any problems with durability.  I've used the spine to pop caps off bottles without incident and the blade has hacked through some pretty dense firewood without skipping a beat.

It should be noted that the Para-Military2 sports an incredibly clean and consistent grind.  I don't think I would except anything less from Spyderco, but other knives I own don't appear to be manufactured with as exacting tolerances.

Mechanism:  2

The Para-Military2 uses a compression lock.  It is incredibly well designed allowing one to close the blade one-handed without placing any fingers between the blade's edge and the handle.  This is a feature that I am in love with.  I'm finding it far more convenient to use than a traditionally placed lock (that must be accessed from the "front" of the knife).

More importantly, it seems to me that the placement of the lock allows the user more positive control over the knife when closing the blade.  Closing a "traditionally" placed lock (typically a liner-lock or frame-lock) one-handed compels the user to flip the blade towards his fingers and, at least in my experience, execute a well choreographed finger ballet to maintain control of the knife and maintain the integrity of various fingers.  On some knives this ballet is more of a problem than others.  The Para-Military2, however, avoids this problem all together with its locking mechanism.

Also, the blade action is so smooth that it's possible to simply disengage the lock with the blade in a semi-upright position and have the blade effortlessly swing closed.

Design Concept:  2

If I had to describe the Para-Military2 in a word it would be "refined."

From the overarching concept to the minor details, the Para-Military2 is exceptionally well-thought.  The design itself is a refinement of the original "Military" knife, still available from Spyderco.  According to their product description, the Para-Military2 is the result of a desire to refine the Military into a better product, enhancing its ergonomics and cutting ability to produce a superior knife.

The aesthetics of the Para-Military2 are great, in my opinion.  It's clean and streamlined.  It has beautiful curves that are purposefully crafted.  Its form is dictated, it would seem, by its function.  A great marriage of usefulness and aesthetics.

Grip:  2

There are a couple things to mention here.  First, the handle is constructed from G10.  The texture of the G10 is exceptional; there's just enough bite to provide a non-slip grip without being irritating in the slightest.  Even with with slight pressure my grip seems secure.  Second, the handle shape is great.  It contours in just the right places facilitating various grip methods (both a traditional forward grip and a reverse grip feel excellent).  Finally worth noting are the finger choil and spine jimping.  These features allow one to choke up on the blade with ease and comfort making detail work a cinch.

Some have complained, or at least noted potential problems, with the handle area around the compression lock.  It has been said that the thinner handle area could be a source of significant discomfort when using the knife for prolonged periods of slicing (particularly through harder materials).  While I haven't used this knife too extensively for slicing through dense material, I haven't noticed any discomfort in the time I've been using the knife.  In gripping the knife it's certainly evident that the handle section is thinner around the compression lock, but it hasn't become uncomfortable.

Spine jimping on the Para-Military2.

Deployment Method:  2

Being my first Spyderco, this is the first knife I have owned (or even used) with a thumb hole.  Within minutes of playing with it out of the box I knew I liked it and after carrying it for the past month or so I can say that I've been convinced it's the best manual opening device out there.  One simply pushes the tip of the thumb into the thumb hole and flicks forward, opening the knife.

The thumb hole on the Para-Military2 is 14mm in diameter.  Spyderco lists it as 14mm on their documentation and I don't have the tech to verify their measurement (digital calipers are on my wishlist...).  It's a good size, I think, allowing easy function even with gloved hands (I've been using a pair of Mechanix Original gloves).

The action on the Para-Military2 is incredibly smooth.  The blade swings open almost instantly with the flick of the thumb.  I have to say it's more addicting than any of the assisted opening actions that are in my drawer.

Carry Method:  2

The Para-Military2 sports a four-position pocket clip.  As such, it's possible to carry tip-up or tip-down on the left or the right.  I have it configured for tip-up carry on the right hand side; I can't fathom why anyone would want to carry this knife tip-down.

Just enough of the knife sticks up above the pocket to facilitate a strong purchase for retrieval while not making the knife feel less-than-secure.  The pocket clip is well-constructed and provides sufficient retention; I am in no way concerned that this knife is going to find its way out of my pocket nor do I believe the pocket clip is going to become looser in the near or distant future.

There is also a prominent lanyard hole on the knife.  It has an internal diameter of about 6mm, or in more practical terms, it can accommodate three strands of 550 paracord.  Adding a lanyard could facilitate quicker retrieval but I don't think it's really necessary for most purposes.  It really boils down to personal preference and I have no need for a lanyard in my everyday carry.

Carry Comfort:  2

The knife is exceptionally light compared to others of the same size that I own.  This makes it quite the pleasure to carry.  It sits nicely and doesn't move unless asked.

Moreover, the Para-Military2 is relatively slim coming in at about 12mm.  It doesn't feel bulky in the pocket and has been exceptionally comfortable to carry.


Total: 20/20


The Spyderco Para-Military2 is the best, most exciting knife that I currently own or have had an opportunity to play with.  I do not have any complaints about this blade.  It has been in my pocket for a while and will remain there for the foreseeable future.


I highly recommend this as an everday carry blade.  For the money (around $110.00 on Amazon) it's a bargain.

Rotring 600 Fountain Pen Review Updated

I'm slowly updating the first few reviews I posted so they will comport with the updated review outlines based on a 10 category, 20 point method.

In any event, I updated the first writing instrument review I posted - the review for the rOtring 600 fountain pen - such that it will comply with the updated method.  The score hasn't changed and much of the content is the same but it will be far easier to compare reviews.

It is available here, if anyone feels compelled to look at the new format as applied.

Anyway, here's a fancy picture of the 600 juxtaposed with a cup of tea and a pile of work.

Zebra F-701 Review

I've seen the Zebra F-701 in plenty of pocket dumps in various corners of the internet.  It seemed to be a relatively well-liked pen so, being me, I decided to pick one up on a recent trip to Staples.

The F-701 is relatively inexpensive as far as I'm concerned.  I paid about $7.00 for it from Staples and imagine that's about the going rate in brick and mortar stores.  Online it's typically less expensive; it is, for example, available on JetPens.com for $5.30.

Of course, I'm using the review system for writing instruments found here to evaluate this pen.

Materials:  2

The exterior of the F-701 is predominantly stainless steel.  I say "exterior" because the core of the barrel is plastic.  A few places have touted the F-701 as a poor man's tactical pen only to be berated by comments disparaging the plastic core and two-part barrel section.  I don't hold much (or any) stock in "tactical pens" so this revelation isn't too disappointing.

In any event, the F-701 is constructed from durable materials.  I haven't encountered any problems in terms of durability and don't expect to, either.

Fit:  1

There aren't any fit problems with the pen; everything is fits together well and doesn't shift when writing or otherwise.

The pocket clip can rotate a slight bit, most likely due to its design.  It's not something that is noticeable unless you're deliberately fiddling with it, but is annoying nonetheless.

Mechanism:  1

The F-701 uses a click-type mechanism.  Zebra calls it a "soft-clicking mechanism."  As far as I've read it's intended to be quieter than other click-type mechanisms.  It is a bit quieter than other pens that I have in my drawer but it's not incredibly quiet.  If you desperately need a quiet pen you should probably consider something other than a click-type mechanism.

Truth be told, I find the "soft-clicking mechanism" a bit muddy; it doesn't have as crisp of a click as I might prefer.  The mechanism has gotten better with use but straight out of the package I wasn't the biggest fan.

The plunger does return to the upright position when the point is extended.  As I've said in the past, I love this feature in click-type pens.

Line:  1

The F-701 retails with a 0.7mm cartridge.  It performs as expected.  It doesn't drag or skip.  I always find myself wanting more from a ballpoint, though.  I can't seem to find one that exceeds my expectations.

Writing Comfort:  2

Compared to the Parker Jotter this pen is far better.  The F-701's grip section doesn't taper, resulting in a consistent hold regardless of where my fingers land.  Also, the F-701's grip has relatively aggressive knurling, a feature I have come to appreciate.  The knurling facilitates a great non-slip grip and I find the texture to be rather pleasant.

Design Concept:  1

While it's a nice looking pen I do believe it's a bit little clunky.  I don't understand why Zebra chose to use a brushed stainless barrel and a glossy pocket clip; I think it would have been a much better choice to maintain the brushed look throughout.  Also, the point of the pen has a series of interesting bevel choices.  While one or two tapered sections would typically suffice, Zebra chose to reduce the diameter in six distinct steps.

Markings and Insignia:  2

The barrel of the pen is absent any markings.  The pocket clip features a small font reading "ZEBRA" and a larger, slightly italicized font with the pen's model designation, "F-701."  The terminus of the pen just below the plunger reads "INDONESIA," the manufacturing origin.

I appreciate the minimalist style Zebra has adopted with respect to branding the F-701.  It's nice to see a cheaper pen without a ton of intrusive markings.

Carry Method:  2

The F-701 uses a traditional pocket clip that's fastened to the very top of the barrel.  Due to its placement only the plunger and a very small portion of the pen body sticks out above the top of a pocket (just over half an inch, by my measure).

The deep carry facilitated by the placement of the pocket clip is a great asset to the F-701.  Deep carry means greater comfort and less snagging.  Also important to note is the fact that the F-701 isn't difficult to retrieve from the pocket; the plunger and pocket clip are more than enough to get a good purchase on the pen.

Carry Durability:  2

The stainless steel construction surely contributes to the F-701's durability in a pocket.  The barrel isn't likely to suffer any significant damage during normal carry.  The clip itself is also robust; it hasn't lost tension in the time I have been carrying the pen.

Carry Comfort:  2

The F-701 isn't uncomfortable to carry.  It sits well in a pocket and doesn't shift its place.  Short of that, there isn't much to say about this particular pen...

Total:  16/20

In the grand scheme of things, this pen is a great value.  For under $10.00 you're getting quite a bit of pen.  The F-701 is probably a better value than the Parker Jotter (despite the 1 point discrepancy, the Jotter having received a 17/20 due to a slightly better mechanism; although, it seems as if the soft-click isn't too terrible compared to the Jotter's mechanism).

There are also a bunch of end-user modifications that can enhance the usefulness of the pen.  There is, for example, a method of installing a Fisher pressurized ink cartridge into the F-701.  Roughly the same system is described at Gear Journal where they also discuss installing the all-metal click-type mechanism from an F-402 into the F-701.

If you're looking for a pen that's better than the cheap ones you've been dragging around but don't want to break the bank, the F-701 would be a great start.

Svord Peasant Knife Review

I picked up the Svord Peasant Knife on a whim a few weeks back.  It seemed like something that would be worth having and I find friction folders intriguing

I unboxed it here and posted some initial photos of its original configuration.

I added a pocket clip made from scrap steel and a lanyard from paracord.  I'm evaluating the knife as if it didn't have a pocket clip as that is how it originally arrived in my hands.

Of course, I'm using the review template found here.

Blade Material:  1


Apparently the blade is fabricated from Sandvik L6 steel.  L6 is a high-carbon tool steel.  From what I've read it's pretty robust in terms of edge retention and the like.  However, it's not "stainless."  It will rust easily if not cared for.  And, of course, you are consistently touching the blade with your fingers - the oils that you're depositing on the blade don't do it well.

In my limited experience with it (trying to clean up the edge and sharpening it after use a few times) it hasn't been too difficult to work with.  It's quite possible to get an incredibly sharp edge out of the L6 and the steel holds onto it for quite a while.

Fit of Parts:  1

The PK uses a very simple design which requires a bit of play between the handle sections to function properly.  I adjusted my PK a bit, loosening the rear screw (so the blade isn't held as tight when it's closed) and kept the other two screws a bit tighter (so the blade "locks" up with a bit more force).  In doing this the bottom of the handle is a bit more "loose" than it otherwise could be but, if I were to tighten that screw down it would inhibit deployment of the blade far too much.

That said, the hardware doesn't fit as tightly as it could.  The pivot screw, for example, has a bit of play that doesn't contribute to the functionality of the joint.

Blade Shape:  2

The PK sports something in between a straight-back and a drop-point blade.  In terms of an EDC blade, I think this sort of blade shape is among the best available.  It has sufficient belly and a nice taper to the point.

The spine of the knife has a consistent thickness down the whole of the blade.

The plain edge is something that I'm growing increasingly fond of in an EDC blade; I do not intend to purchase any more partially serrated blades for reasons too lengthy to discuss here.

Blade Grind:  0

Using what could be be described as a flat grind, the blade of the PK maintains a relatively consistent width down the spine and tapers down to the edge.  This makes the majority of the blade robust and should contribute to durability.  It's evident that the grind isn't perfectly consistent when comparing one side to another.  This isn't necessarily detrimental to the performance of the knife and does seem to add to the peasant-like character that Svord is aiming to achieve.

Moreover, the edge that was on the blade from the factory was a bit off-centered.  This isn't too annoying but is going to take a bit of time to clean up.

While I do believe the "humble" intent of the designers influenced the blade and edge grind I can't help but assess a zero in this category.  The same look could have been accomplished without sacrificing a precise grind.

Mechanism: 1

The PK is a friction-folder meaning there is no locking mechanism, per se; the blade stays open and closed as a result of friction between the handle sections and the blade.  Friction-folders are gaining popularity in many places as a result of legislatures attempting to regulate criminal behavior by banning locking knives.  Efficacy of such bans aside, the friction-folder is and should be a timeless design.

It's profoundly simple yet yields a remarkably sturdy "lock up," for lack of a better term.  It's not infallible but it's certainly strong and safe enough for most everyday uses.  Gripping the knife by the handle only enhances the safety of the blade as your hand is placing pressure on the tang, preventing the blade from closing.

The "middle screw," as it were, operates to prevent the knife from opening "too far," causing the tang to be buried between the handle sections, and also prevents the blade from closing "too far," which would cause the very tip of the knife to engage with the bottom screw.  In that regard, this is a very well thought design.

With that in mind, the design can be a bit troublesome.  If, as I have, the handle sections are loosened enough to facilitate relatively easy opening the knife is prone to opening slightly during carry.  Of course, if I tighten down the system to prevent it from opening slightly in the pocket it becomes far more difficult to open and close.  In that regard, it could be slightly better.

Design Concept:  1

It's a noble design using the nothing more than the most fundamental aspects of a folding knife.

It's a great little design for everyday utility use.  It's also relatively benign-looking; it's not a knife which is going to engender tons of odd looks because it's "overly tactical" or has a blade profile which looks incredibly aggressive.  In that respect, it's a good design for everyday carry because it won't raise too many eyebrows.

Grip:  1

The design of the handle strongly reminds me of a jalapeno.

I try to choke up as much on the blade as I can which places the wider portion of the handle behind my index and middle fingers.  This gives me a decent bit of control over the blade.

The grip isn't particularly comfortable; the slim aluminum handles are probably the least comfortable of the various styles available (the other two being molded polypropylene and wood).  That said, it's not more uncomfortable than other folders I've handled.

Deployment Method:  1

I've seen a bunch of different methods to open this knife one-handed.  All of them are somewhat clunky.  That said, you don't have to open it with one hand.  Sure, the ability to open a knife with one hand is a great feature but it's not a make-or-break element.

My preferred method of deployment for the PK has been resting the bottom of the handle in the palm of my left hand, wrapping my thumb over the bottom of the handle, and applying torque to the tang with my right hand.  I close the knife in much the same manner, but with torque applied to the spine of the blade.

I have no problem opening and closing this knife.  If you adjust the tension of the screws you can make to easier or more difficult to open.

If you desperately need a knife that you can easily operate one-handed, this isn't the blade for you.

Carry Method:  1

As it comes, the PK doesn't have a pocket clip.  It'll settle to the bottom of whatever pocket you put it in, for better or worse.  In the jeans I consistently wear the tang of the PK still protrudes slightly from the top of my pocket when it has settled to the bottom.  This is convenient, assuming your pockets are the same depth as mine.

There is a lanyard hole on the end of the tang.  This would allow you to loop a piece of paracord or leather through it, make a fancy looking knot  knot befitting a peasant, and retrieve the knife from deeper pockets using the lanyard.  This method is certainly effective and makes the PK rather easy to keep accessible.

Carry Comfort:  2

This knife is slim.  With the aluminum handles, the thickest part of the knife is the blade itself.  It practically disappears in a pocket.  Also important to note, it's lightweight.  When I've carried it it's practically unnoticeable.  Due to its slim width it doesn't print too much either; were it not for the lanyard it would be nearly imperceptible to the casual passerby.

One concern with the PK is, as mentioned, the possibility that it will open slightly in the pocket.  This can be prevented by tightening the hardware.  I don't feel that I can really dock points because of the tension I was running the hardware at, so I'm just avoiding the problem with respect to carry comfort.


Total:  11/20

The Svord Peasant Knife is neat.  It has been exceptionally fun and incredibly easy to play around with.  If you're willing to give this guy the attention it's a great blade for the price.  I do plan to purchase another with a polypropylene handle and perhaps the wood version, too; hey, for under 20 bucks it's absolutely worth it.

In any event, I'm not planning to keep it in my pocket; I'll stick to my smaller locking folders for the most part.  On the off chance that I'm compelled into a jurisdiction that frowns on locking folders I'll toss it in my pocket but short of that I'll just keep it around for the occasional task.
 

Columbia River Knife and Tool M16-14SFG Knife Review

I received my Columbia River Knife and Tool M16-14SFG a few years ago as a gift from my girlfriend.  I’ve carried it extensively, used it a good amount, and thought it would be a good candidate for my first knife review.

I'm using the template I outlined here for this and all other knife reviews.

New edge, fresh oil, and a cup of tea; a delightful morning.

Blade Material: 1

The blade is manufactured from 8Cr14MoV steel.  From what I’ve read it’s a little harder than the widely-used AUS-8 steel.  While it doesn’t compare to the edge-retention of VG-10 or S30V it’s a bit easier to put and keep an edge on.

In my personal experience it's easy to sharpen and keeps its edge relatively well.

I did damage the blade early in my ownership.  I was making a feather stick and neglected to realize someone had driven a nail into the middle.  Needless to say, I caught it with the blade and it produced a sizable nick.  I took a coarse diamond stone to it and repaired it with relative ease. There's no doubt the ease of repair was facilitated by the slightly softer steel (whereas a harder steel, like S30V, would have been far more difficult to clean up).

Ultimately, it’s not a high-end steel, but it seems to be a good all-around performer.

Fit of Parts:  2

Everything fits together nicely on this knife.  I've owned and used this knife for quite a while and it hasn't loosened.  The action is as smooth as it was fresh out of the box (maybe even better now that it has been broken in a bit).

I initially had some concerns about the AutoLAWKS device, thinking that it might become damaged, loosen up, or otherwise lose functionality over time.  This has not been the case.

Blade Shape: 1

The M16-14SFG uses a tanto-style blade. It’s also partially serrated with CRKT's proprietary “veff” serrations.

In terms of an EDC knife, the tanto blade shape isn’t optimum.  It’s lacking in the slicing department and because of the serrations it’s not a great performer when it comes to detail work either.

That said, it’s still a pretty good blade.

The veff serrations are a nice design but leave a little bit to be desired.  They're super sharp and do seem to get through fibrous materials with ease.  The trouble is, they're VERY delicate.  The points are prone to bending even when cutting through relatively easy material (cardboard, for example, caused a couple tips to curve a bit).  Maybe a harder steel would be a better choice when executing this design.

I strongly believe that a plain edge would be a better overall performer.  Getting rid of the serrations entirely would almost indubitably yield a better knife.

Blade Grind: 2

The knife has what I believe to be a sabre grind.  The spine of the knife is large and extends straight down toward the cutting edge approximately ⅖ of the blade.  The blade then tapers to the edge.  CKRT states on the product page that the knife sports a hollow grind from the factory but I’m not convinced.  If there is a hollow grind it’s very conservative and practically imperceptible.  Even so, a hollow grind isn’t the best choice for an everyday carry knife; I’m more interested in something that’s going to hold up to the rigors of daily use.  The CRKT M16-14SFG’s grind does just that.

Mechanism: 2

The M16-14SFG utilizes a liner-lock made of 2CR12 steel.  I haven’t found much material regarding the properties of this steel but I haven’t encountered any problems with it.  The lock-bar itself is skeletonized.  It sets up nicely when the blade is opened and doesn't engage too far (which would mechanically limit its locking abilities).  When pressure is applied to the spine of the blade the lock bar does, of course, flex slightly but I haven't gotten it to shift along the bottom of the blade.

This knife also uses CRKT’s “AutoLAWKS” system.  Essentially, it’s a small lever system which springs into place when the blade is opened.   It functions to prevent the liner-lock from being disengaged inadvertently. CRKT considers this to mimic the functionality of a fixed-blade.  While it does make it more difficult for the lock to fail I’m not convinced that it’s as bomb-proof as a true fixed-blade.

The lock bar functions as it should and the AutoLAWKS system makes it more secure than “plain” liner-locks without making it more difficult to operate.  For those reason, I’m assessing a 2 for this category.

The red switch of CRKT's AutoLAWKS system.

Design Concept: 1

I’m relatively impressed by the design of many CRKT knives, the M16-14SFG isn’t an exception. Its form is dictated predominantly by function, a design philosophy I quite like. I can’t say that it’s the most attractive knife I’ve ever seen, though.

The large holes in the handle are there to reduce weight.  The smaller holes, those that aren't there for screwing down the pocket clip, are there for aesthetics, as far as I can tell.

Grip:  1

The grip on the M16-14SFG is well-designed.  It's a relatively large knife, so there's no problem with the grip being too small.  This is one of the few folders out there that features a hilt.  It's a convenient feature for some tasks but can also be a bother.  The hilt created by the flippers makes it difficult to choke up on the blade for detail work and forces distance between the grip and the blade.

I don't find myself in situations where I'm concerned that my hand will slip over the blade while I'm using the knife.

Deployment Method: 2

The knife does employ a thumb-stud but it’s practically useless. My preferred deployment method is the flipper. With a quick snap of the index finger the blade deploys.  Keep the joint well-oiled and the blade can deploy as fast or faster than any assisted opening knife I've ever used.

I had contemplated giving the deployment method a 1 simply because the thumb-stud isn’t useful for opening but the flipper is just so wonderful.  You can’t go wrong with it.

An added bonus (legally questionable here in MA) is the ability to use the flipper to deploy the knife as you're pulling it out of your pocket.  It is possible, if you're thinking about it, to catch the flipper on the back edge of your front pocket while removing the knife and cause the blade to open.  I'm not convinced it was designed to do this but it's possible.

Carry Method: 2

Front pocket carry.

Back pocket carry.

There is a four position pocket clip on the M16-14SFG. It can be carried tip-up or -down, left or right. I prefer to carry tip-up for reasons I won’t articulate here. If, however, I were to orient the clip to carry tip-down the flippers would sit at the top of the pocket and would, as far as I’m concerned, get in the way.

The clip itself is sturdy and affixed to the body of the knife by three screws.  It's at a height where it doesn't seem like too much of the handle is exposed.  It's not necessarily "discrete," but it's certainly slim enough to sit in a pocket without attracting too much attention.  I don't concern myself too much with the concealment of knives; not many people pay attention to what's in other people's pockets and, fortunately, the jurisdiction in which I live isn't as nutty about knives as others.

For tip-up carry, as I choose to carry it, this knife has to be a 2.  The clip is well-executed and the ability to universally orient it is convenient.  It carries with just enough handle outside the pocket; enough to get a decent purchase on it but not so much that it's too exposed or feels poorly secured.

Carry Comfort:  1

The knife is pretty slim which contributes greatly to its comfort.  It is a rather large knife, but it doesn't seem it when in my pocket.

The flippers are the biggest complaint I have when it comes to carry comfort.  Naturally, the flippers stick out well beyond the handle of the knife; they take up ample real estate in whatever pocket the knife is carried.  Also, they can damage other things in the pocket.  For example, I often carry the knife in my right front pocket along with my wallet.  The flipper rubs up against the side of the wallet and erodes the material.  While it hasn't caused catastrophic damage it's working its way in that direction.  Sure, I could move the knife, and I have (I carry it in my right back pocket now) but anything placed in the pocket with it will be affected.  The flippers really monopolize the whole pocket.

If the knife was carried tip-down with the flippers at the top the damage problem probably wouldn't exist but they would inhibit access to the pocket (the width of the hilt created by the flippers is approximately 2.25 inches; that's a lot of space).


TOTAL:  15/20

This is a great knife.  It's affordable and well-made.  Some might find it a bit too big for everyday carry, but that hasn't been a problem for me.  If I could change one thing it would be eliminating the serrations; I'm gradually discovering (as many have) that partially serrated blades are more irritating than useful and this knife is no exception.  If I sharpen the hell out of it they'll eventually disappear and, with the quality of the build on this knife, I imagine it will last long enough for my dreams to come to fruition.

The M16-14SFG is available online for just under $50.00.  At that price it's a steal.  It's a great addition to any pocket or bag.

Field Notes Brand Clic Pen Review

I picked up a six-pack of Field Notes Brand Clic Pens when I ordered a set of their notebooks from Huckberry . I really wasn’t too interested in the pens themselves, but was saving some money by ordering the package.  As Field Notes is a relatively well-received brand, I thought I would carry one for a bit and type up a review.

Essentially, the Field Notes Brand Clic Pen is a Bic Clic with the Field Notes logo printed on the barrel.  There isn't much else to it...

Materials: 1

The barrel is plastic.  It’s not particularly sturdy; using the G-2 I reviewed a couple weeks back as a metric, it’s more prone to flex and perhaps breakage.   I don’t expect the barrel to break during normal use, though.  In the grand scheme of things, I've had less durable pens but also far more durable ones.

Fit: 1

There’s nothing particularly poor about the fit of the parts on this pen.   The barrel screws together tightly without any play.  There is, however, a bit of play between the point, when extended, and the barrel.  This can result in some movement of the tip when writing.

Mechanism: 1

Following the name “Clic,” the pen utilizes a click-type mechanism.  It works, but it’s nothing special.  The plunger doesn’t return to the upright position when the point is deployed.   Also, there is significant play between the sides of the barrel and the plunger.

Line: 1

The included cartridge is a medium point black ball-point.   As far as ball-points go it’s average.  The line it lays down is relatively smooth and doesn’t skip.   The point does feel like it drags a bit on the page, though.

The ink itself isn’t as black as a black should be, in my opinion.

Writing Comfort: 1

The dragging feeling of the point causes my hand to fatigue quicker than it normally does.  It almost feels like I have to fight the pen a little bit.  Instead of gliding through through my thoughts I have to pull it around.

Design Concept: 1

Nothing special.  The Bic Clic is a time-tested design but it’s not terribly attractive.  The silver ring around the middle is a nice embellishment.

Markings and Insignia: 0

Emblazoned on the barrel of the pen are the words “FIELD NOTES” and “fieldnotesbrand.com” each on its own line.  The text is pretty intrusive and doesn’t seem to fit well with the pen itself.  Moreover, the printing isn’t stellar; the ink isn’t consistently laid upon the barrel.  The pocket clip has BIc’s Trademarks, the “Clic” branding, and the “MEXICO” manufacturing origin.

If the printing was better executed I would probably give the pen a 1 in this category but, alas, the printing isn’t that great.

Carry Method: 1

A simple stamped and folded metal pocket clip is fastened into the plastic barrel.  The design of the clip causes approximately an inch of the pen to stick out above the pocket line.  Retrieving the pen, when clipped, is simple due to this protrusion.

Carry Durability: 1

After carrying this pen in my front pocket for a couple weeks the clip has loosened slightly.  This isn’t due to bending of the clip itself, but is due to the clip’s mounting pulling away from the barrel.  As such, it’s not something that could be corrected by simply bending the clip back.

That said, it’s not a complete failure.   It holds up pretty well and, unless you’re wearing pants with incredibly thick fabric, there won’t be a problem.

Carry Comfort: 1

The portion of the pen that actually sits in the pocket is comfortable, but I’ve found that the large section outside the pocket to get in the way.  It protrudes just enough to be annoying. I would prefer it to sit a bit lower in the pocket.


Total: 9/20

The Field Notes Brand Clic Pen isn't anything special.  There are definitely better pens on the market, particularly for everyday carry.  I'm certainly happy to have something else in my pocket.